More people need to learn to use Rational types. A pretty large majority of the numbers that people care about in real life can easily be represented by a ratio of integers, and they allow math with perfect precision.

Sigh. Guess I need the joke explained?

What’s wrong with strict types?

Fuck ChatGPT.

tl;dr tl;dr: use a modern compiler.

Can we just not with the AI-generated illustrations?

ArsTechnica, baby

I know they’re owned by Condé Nast, but they seem to genuinely maintain a good deal of journalistic independence

I seem to recall coming across a glossary that had something to the effect of,

mutual recursion - see recursion, mutual

recursion, mutual - see mutual recursion

Yep, checks out to me.

The fact that someone else fixed the issue doesn’t really excuse the absolutely unacceptable original response to a very reasonable request.

I’m much more interested in seeing an apology, or any sort of indication that the dev understands how disrespectful they were.

Crow/raven!

alias go-go-gadget=sudo

$ go-go-gadget apt update

One word: unionize.

You had me at “declarative”.

Not OP, but coming from the same place: less annoying (I hope!) atheist.

Or the original plot of The Matrix, before the studio execs decided audiences were too stupid.