• corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      If all the things in the work queue, you’re balking on a COLOUR SCHEME?

      That’s like stopping the construction crew for using the wrong colour work boots, man!

      • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        No it isn’t, if a modern app doesn’t have dark-mode to protect your eyes Then it’s a health-hazard

        • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Thats nonsense

          Literally spent 30 seconds on a Google before you start spewing lies like this.

          There’s a variety of reasons to prefer dark mode, but spreading fake health information isn’t valid.

          • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            I spent reading books, before YOU started smearing a well-know fact as a lie It’s connected with causing myopia & eye-strains

            Your precious google won’t tell you that (Or maybe you simply clicked the first link that confirmed your bias)

              • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Pick up an opthalmology book, find it yourself & ask your opthalmology specialist Those are my sources & here’s a website too (do you have the guts to touch grass ?)

                I already mentioned it, it’s the same reason why we use blue-light filters & why we use anti-glare screen protectors

                But apparently a single “google-search” is enough for you

  • penguinclaw@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Really enjoying Pixelfed. In fact I have found it’s fairly smooth going replacing Meta apps and Twitter.

  • addie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Absolutely NO sexuality explicit content. This includes, but not limited to, images/videos/chat around sexual acts. There are other places on the internet for this.

    😥

    • needanke@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Seems fair. There are many places for erotic/porn content on the web. And for a federated network it is good to not force instance owners to manage avoiding the hosting of nudity by federating it.

      • Gawdl3y@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Nudity isn’t inherently sexual, and they pointedly have not mentioned it in the quoted text. It sounds like only explicit sexual content is forbidden, not nudity.

        I do think even this is an overreach for a federated network, though, assuming Pixelfed is enforcing this on all instances (is that even possible?). It should be on the instance owners to make that decision. I couldn’t find where the quoted text is sourced from, however.