• AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      xkcd comics are available under a CC-By-NC 2.5 licence, so you’ve successfully pirated by not including attribution (as long as people can’t tell at a glance that it’s xkcd from the art style or comment thread you posted it to), but to seal the deal, it’d be a crime to sell it.

      • Fiery@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I couldn’t tell at glance this was from xkcd and am willing to testify to a jury, when’s the court date?

          • Venia Silente@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Whaaaat? This has to go through reporting to count?

            Maaaan, pirating things is so complex these days. I long for the days of napster and emule. </s>

    • Venia Silente@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Technically you can: if you distribute the comic but don’t give the attribution, you are breaking the terms of the license which is just about the closest thing to “pirating” it that you can do.

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        But “breach of license” is so much more lame than “piracy!”*

        *Yes, a lot of piracy is itself breach of license, hush

  • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    There are probably some teenagers pirating stuff right now who weren’t even alive when this comic was drawn. I’m old.

  • owl@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Here is my idea: Everyone makes a private key. When they buy a song they receive the file and a digital signature by the label saying they sold it to your privatepublic key. When you are caught with a bunch of songs, you have to prove ownership using your key. Tadaa provable ownership, no blockchain, You loose the file, but still have the signature? You can download it again and all is good.

    EDIT: Of course, they would sign the public key, sorry.

      • owl@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I don’t think so. There nothing non fungible in my idea and nfts require a blockchain.

    • bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      A digital signature from the label would be created with their private key.

      What would they be signing? Your public key plus the ID of the song? They can’t sign your private key, it’s private.

      What stops you sharing your private key and a song with a friend. Then when either of you need to provide proof, you can both show that you have the private key that matches the signed file?

      • owl@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Well they would sign my public key plus ID of the song. I can prove, it is my public key and everyone can verify the song belongs to me.

        You are right, to ensure noone can “share login” so to say, it needs to be tied to you personally. That would deny privacy sadly.

        EDIT: Didn’t notice I wrote the wrong thing, thanks for notifying me.

      • owl@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        In this construct the key is the thing, that signifies the owner. If it’s lost, there is no help. Unless the key is tied to you and an authority can vouch for you.

      • bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Well if the record label was still around they could make ownership details public, or let you download the signed file again.

        • Allero@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          How would they know the copy legally belongs to you if you lose the key? Would they require some form of ID on top of that?

  • Magnetic_dud@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I saw someone on YouTube pissed that they bought 700 ebooks from Amazon and now that they enforce a harder DRM he can’t read them anymore.

    Bruh, you voted with your wallet to get DRM in your ebooks. You can’t complain if one day they change the encryption

    • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I fully believe that if you paid for something, it gives you the right to go pirate another copy.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      The vast majority of the public hsve no idea what you just said.

      Their brain goes “I like book. I buy book! No more book? But I buy book!”

      • houseofleft@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I agree, but I also sort of think that’s fair enough. The fact that most people “buying” ebooks don’t understand what their transaction implies suggests a major market failing.

  • ch00f@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    PSA: Download all your kindle books. Even if you don’t plan on cracking their DRM, you’ll have the option to in the future should you want to.

  • Sorse@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Small note: iTunes doesn’t have DRM anymore (since 2009)

    Apple Music (the subscription) has DRM though, but you should never have a collection on a subscription service, because it can go away at any time

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      You mean those things that get scratched all the time and not have their revenue go towards the artist anyway?

      • arthurpizza@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Several years back, a group of friends and I gathered with our copies of the Nine Inch Nails album “The Downward Spiral.” Unfortunately, all three CDs were heavily scratched. However, by combining parts of the same songs that played well on different discs, we managed to create a complete version of the entire album.

        The record companies never gave a damn about quality.

        • Nalivai@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          There was nothing about that in the original quote. That’s like a completely different conversation.

          • samus12345@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yes, there was. “Piracy” in this context is specifically the unauthorized copying of data. Carjacking has nothing to do with that.

            • Nalivai@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              In this and every other context, renting exists. And in this and every other context, the fact that someone rents you something doesn’t mean you are allowed to access it for free. Renting a movie or a videogame isn’t purchasing, doesn’t mean you are allowed to access it for free. Renting a car isn’t purchasing, doesn’t mean you’re allowed to take it for free.
              Copyright issues aside, the slogan I reacted to is just plain wrong.

  • comrade19@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I have to download pirated video games otherwise I can’t play them offline on my handheld. They also launch 10x faster. I learnt that you can’t use everything you own a copy of offline!

    • Scorbunny@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I use a mix of Goldberg emulator and GOG i prefer Steam though. Mostly for valves Proton compatibility layer and all that valve does for linux gaming. So if a game is drm free on steam i get it there.

      Fuck denuvo tho that shit needs to die in a fire.