• finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Doesn’t like 90% of Mozilla’s funding come from Google? At least expanding their paid services could be seen as trying to turn that around.

    • Sips'@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      From my understanding thunbird is somewhat separated from this. From the article linked by OP it says:

      What’s crystal clear is that Thunderbird’s ever-increasing donation revenue (currently its sole source of income) is allowing for some explosive growth that’s long overdue. To add some context to this, Thunderbird received $2.8 million in donation revenue during 2021. Two years later, in 2023, it received $8.6 million in donations. I’m told that total financial contributions for 2024 were even higher, though the final amount hasn’t been officially released.

      • mke@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I should donate again. As someone who still depends on gmail, I keep forgetting how annoying it was to get ads every time I refreshed my inbox, before I switched to their app. Glad things seem to be working out.

  • conorab@lemmy.conorab.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    If this works out it might be a nice place to migrate to away from my self-hosted e-mail provided they eventually let you bring your own domain. Just sucks that e-mail is essentially the most secure thing you need to have since compromising that can compromise every account attached to the e-mail. That’s a lot of trust you need to instill in your e-mail host.

    • Photuris@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I have fond memories of self-hosting a qmail setup for a long time, then eventually migrating to a postfix configuration, back in the day.

      Keeping up with spam filtering finally did me in.

      • conorab@lemmy.conorab.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The spam filtering is painful. I kinda work around it by giving a unique e-mail for everything and of one starts getting spammed I just rid of that e-mail. Tends to give you advance warning of data breaches too since you’ll start seeing the spam come in before the announcement.

        • Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I meant hosting wise, at home or using a VPS? How did you get a fixed IP/ what are you using for a proxy?

          • ctrl_alt_esc@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            VPS, I wouldn’t run a mail server from my home network. If you go with mailinabox you don’t need to set up a proxy, it’s pretty simple.

          • conorab@lemmy.conorab.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            It’s a colocated server. I provided the physical server and they put it into a rack in a datacenter with power and networking (static IP).

            • conorab@lemmy.conorab.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Eh it depends. I’m fortunate enough to be in a good IP block so I don’t get my e-mails dropped purely on that. It’s been a good learning experience and I’ve leaned on my own server a number of times for troubleshooting at work since I can see the whole mail flow. The only problem I have is the free Outlook/Hotmail will not accept my e-mails. Everybody else seems fine. All that said, I don’t host anybody else’s e-mail so I haven’t had any spam come out of my IP, and I would never in a million years host e-mail for a customer.

  • Ray1992xD@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    No matter how much I hate Mozilla’s new path, companies like this challenging big tech are bold and have a lot of courage. If I set aside my personal op opinions about Mozilla, I actually admire them for this. They can actually dent big tech with funding from big tech itself.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      For now, they’re better than Google. I have some bad opinions about them, but anything better than Google competing with Google is an improvement.

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I keep hearing a lot of negative comments about Mozilla lately. I’m wondering if this move is more in line with then just turning into another google rather than disrupting the marketplace.

        • mke@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          If they’re user funded, their incentives are fundamentally different from Google’s. Even thinking as a business, it makes no sense to enshittify the way Google does. It’s a different choice, even if it’s not the choice you wanted.

      • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        yes but this takes time. its great to have alternatives in the meantime.

      • JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Google only checked out and cashed in after getting a monopoly. Mozilla let themselves fade into irrelevance.

    • 0x0@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s a saturated market and email is starting to disappear (it’ll take years, but the signs are there).
      They’d be better using it on the browser and ditching other products.

      • moitoi@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Email won’t disappear sooner or later. It’s a huge part of communication between companies, nonprofit, state, etc. It may be less between people or with consumers. But, it still is widely use otherwise.

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        No its never going to disappear. If you are referring to people using slack and chat apps, those are locked in walled gardens where your messages cant ever leave.

        Email can be moved anywhere easily.

        • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          On top of that, people still use email to sign up for these gardens. Technically, you could use your phone number too. I wonder how far could you take this idea of living completely without email.

          Job applications, and several other sign ins still depend on email, so that’s going to be a bit of a hitch.

          • fishpen0@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yeah and then we can really go hard destroying the lives of people without phone access.

            I work for a healthcare company that serves the under privileged and right now in most cities it’s easier to guarantee someone has email than a consistent phone number thanks to free WiFi hotspots. You can miss a phone payment and still read your email even if you’re cut off from cellular service.

        • 0x0@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s insecure by default and Kids These Days™ prefer messaging apps, which have boomed in the last decade.
          Time will tell.

          • JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            What do you make of the use of email in the business world? You’re right that quite a bit of that has turned into instant messaging as well, ie I text my boss instead of sending them mail but it definitely feels like that’s going away a lot slower if not expanding

            • PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Email is a must for between businesses. Having said that, lots of internal communication is findingther channels, like Teams, Slack, and so on.

              • fishpen0@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                We actually heavily rely on connected channels to talk to most of our vendors now. Once you are on enterprise level support pretty much every vendor gives you a dedicated slack or teams channel.

                It’s great since people come and go and we don’t lose our vendor comms history in random inboxes or have someone not CCd on. Any vendor we have linked is also one less vendor someone is likely to be phished talking to the wrong person on the wrong email. For support tickets there’s no wrapping and encrypting shit steps to send critical info over email, we use the slack channel. It really solves a lot of BS

          • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            So… Exactly how it was 20 years ago. Kids Those Days used AIM and Yahoo Messenger instead of slack and discord.

      • Kualdir@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Any business2business or consumer2business communication will likely still happen over email for a very long time

      • scratchee@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Email isn’t going anywhere. It’s the ipv4 of communication. You can list 100 things bad about it and none of it matters, too many things are now built on top of it, no competitor can possibly have a chance without first reimplementing email, and then they’re just adding extensions which everyone else ignores, and email continues.

        The more plausible threat to email is that it gets siloed into the top 5 or 6 providers and everyone else gets filtered out as spam (ie you need gmail, hotmail, etc or your emails will never reach anyone)

        • Scrollone@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          The big providers problem is already true, but DMARC and DKIM mitigated that problem.

      • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        email is starting to disappear

        The fuck it is lol, do you have any idea how much email is used in literally everything? How old are you?

  • gamer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Lol sure destroy all the trust with your users THEN launch an email service. Hard pass fro me.

    I guarantee you they’re already planning to train an LLM on everybody’s emails, or at least sell them to AI companies doing training.

  • KingDingbat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I have a 20ish year old history in my Gmail account organized in labels and all that. I wonder if it will be viable to migrate?

    • TheEntity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Considering labels are very non-standard, which caused trouble over IMAP since forever, I wouldn’t count on that part.

      • Scrollone@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Labels are displayed as folders on IMAP, which means that a single message could appear in multiple folders. Are there any other problems you’re talking about?

        • TheEntity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          One of the problems that annoyed me in the past is the complexity and ambiguity of deleting an email over IMAP. Depending on whether it’s the last label of the deleted email, deleting an email from a label’s directory either removes a label from this email, or actually deletes the email.

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Please archive shit. It’s OK to save old data, but not on the service. There are ways. Even banks, the most obsessive and legally strapped data hoarders keep their 5+ year old data in deep cold storage, away from the active services. 99.9^% of information that old won’t be looked at by anyone.

      • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Not true.

        It’s much easier to keep old data in active storage where it can be classified, searched, and have retention/deletion policies applied. Moving it elsewhere makes it more likely you’ll just hang onto it forever while not using it at all.

        • dustyData@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          When was the last time you had to find a 20 year old email? Share your anecdotes.

          Edit: I’m not being snarky, there are legitimate and more functional solutions.

          • Lemming6969@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Warranty… Some are 15-20 years, but you need proof of purchase docs, which are often emailed data.

            • dustyData@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Why not having an archive of exclusively warranties? Emails can be downloaded, indexed and compressed. I agree on keeping archives of old stuff. But emails used as cloud drives are a huge problem for IT and security reasons. A legal folder is better and facilitates backup, encryption and much more accessibility.

          • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I don’t disagree that you should set up retention policies to delete old email, I disagree that you should remove old emails from primary service/storage.

            I actually did need a 15 year old email a few months ago. I don’t recall what I needed, but I then set up a retention policy to delete old stuff.

  • Geetnerd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m listening…

    But how is a small non-profit going to afford a free email service? Ads in every email?

    • Rachel@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Based on what I’ve seen in their forums it will be a paid service. I think it will be free at first for beta testers but I assume they are targeting people who currently use services like Proton.

      • Geetnerd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Thanks for the info.

        But I think they’ll still need an ad driven free version to gain acceptance.

  • 0x0@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    So the Mozilla Foundation is gonna waste google money on email infrastructure? Hmmm… 'k… it’s not like their browser could use some love…

      • 0x0@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        No there yet but not getting the love it deserved either.
        Maybe they oughta try asking for money like Wikipedia and KDE, maybe then they could become independent from Google and focus on actually developing a quality browser instead of making every app be about profit.

    • hamsterkill@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Thunderbird’s corp (MZLA) does not get Google money so far as i’m aware. It is a different subsidiary corp from Firefox’s Mozilla Corp.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Sounded great until the “assist” ai feature. I friggin hate Gemini in gmail so any other kind of ai is an automatic nogo for me

  • commander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’d consider it. If they host things outside of the US/start moving operations overseas, it’d be a lot more interesting. I sub to Proton for email, VPN, and drive support. Still hoping someday for proper Linux drive support so Mozilla/Thunderbird can target that

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    welp I signed up for the waitlist.

    I’ll use it for a disposable email at first, and if it endures and does well I’ll move my main shit off to it.

  • Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I think it’s incredibly important that people know, with absolute certainty, whether or not the new Mozilla/Firefox privacy policy in any way applies to / covers such a service.

    I’m not saying I know the answer- What I’m saying without a concrete, permanently applied answer it’s not even considerable.

    • Rachel@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      There is no email service that exists without a terms of use and privacy policy. I still feel everyone overreacted about Firefox. It’s funnier how many people said they switched to Brave because of it and all the super shady stuff Brave has done.

      • Reygle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Firefox/Mozilla operated without any of the new additions for nearly the entire history of the internet until this year. If anything, “over”-reacting to the new policies was too weak a reaction. You do you and all, but I’ll agree to very strongly disagree.

      • britaliope@kourjetez.bzh
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        at exists without a terms of use and privacy policy. I still feel everyone overreacted about Firefox. It’s funnier how many people said they switched to Brave because of it and all the super shady stuff Brave has done.

        Being angry at the Mozilla foundation for those changes is understandable. Switching to Brave because of it is plain stupid.

        • Sequence5666@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I do think the brave devs or teams starting spreading the “switch to brave” as a growth hack. No right minded person would pick brave over ff. Maybe librewolf sure.

    • SaltSong@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      What is it that you’re concerned about? Assume that I have no idea what either the new or old Mozilla privacy policy is, please. I tend to assume that all such are a pack of lies and everything is spying on me.

    • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      You can’t know that with absolute certainty. Sorry, but if you’re using someone elses server for your communications and they’re not end to end encrypted, you should just assume that they can and do read your emails, and act accordingly.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Here’s what I want… I leave a computer on at home and it checks my email. I get emails from it at my phone. No setup. Make it work like Sinkthing used to work. I don’t want cloud anything. Fucking backup nightmare where my shit ends up kidnapped by a company for monthly ransom.

  • arch@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I was thinking ab this being april fool bcz it’s posted on 1st…