• db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It isn’t yours, if you use them you signed it all over to them. They patented your DNA.

    • deranger@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      That’s not true in the slightest. I agree with the fuck 23&me sentiment but you don’t have to make things up to criticize them.

    • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m hoping in 500 years, my DNA sequence is found on a perfectly preserved micro SD card and my clone gets to meet President Camacho and take on Beef Supreme and the Dildozer on Monday Night Rehabilitation.

      • Alphane Moon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s the optimistic timeline, we still have to actually get there first.

        I am sure you can come with what a pessimistic timeline would look like.

    • Flagstaff@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The monsters.

      Well, that originally autocorrected to “mobsters,” but I suppose that’d work in a certain context, too.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          For those too lazy to click through:

          However, on June 13, 2013, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in the Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc, that human genes cannot be patented because DNA is a “product of nature.” All gene patents were invalidated with this ruling. However, the ruling did not prohibit the patenting of DNA that is manipulated (i.e., no longer a product of nature) or processes for identifying DNA sequences.

          • slickgoat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            So if a lab rat adds, deletes or edits a person’s DNA it is no longer a ‘product of nature’?

        • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          […] human genes cannot be patented because DNA is a “product of nature.” All gene patents were invalidated with this ruling.

          did you paste the link to admit you were wrong?

  • aleq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    There’s a non-zero % chance that a nazi with ties to the government and unlimited money might be interested in this data… 👀

  • oakey66@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    After the Ashkenazi data leak, I deleted my data with them. Never sharing that again.

  • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Many people got lured into this mistake without properly understanding the risk.

    Now we know the risk.

    Deny the parasite all data possible going forward.

    • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, I did mine like 15 years ago around when they first started accepting international orders (At the time they didn’t even have labs in the UK and they paid to TNT overnight ship my spit to America)

    • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      If both your parents did a DNA test with the same company, and you are their child and not the result of a liaison with the milkman, you are 100% screwed.

      If you are the product of a liaison with the milkman and the milkman didn’t do a DNA test with the same company, you’re 50% screwed.

      If you were adopted, then there will be no impact from the DNA test, but if your parents didn’t tell you, they’re 100% screwed. (Assuming that your birth parents didn’t have a DNA test.)

      In other words, there’s a non-zero chance that you’re screwed.

  • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Shit, they’re gonna want my DNA. I’m 1/8th Cherokee and I’m descended from Napoleon, Julius Caesar, Christopher Columbus, Abraham Lincoln, every signatory of the magna carta, Jesus, and the Mayflower. The actual ship. Don’t ask.

    Thank you 23andme for telling me just how goddamn special I am simply for being born, now I’m not under any pressure to ever accomplish anything.

  • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    You guys know that you share half your genome with your kids and parents, so it’s not even just the users’ data, but also people who might not even know about this.

  • biofaust@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I just passed by the settings page and requested all my data. When I receive it, I will delete the account which, according to their full privacy statement, requires them to discard my sample, delete my data AND opt me out of 23andMe Research.

  • SplashJackson@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I believe you and your genome become property of whomever buys the data and you’ll have to go over to their house and rake their leaves for them and stuff

  • GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    When the ACA gets repealed insurance comoanies can use it to preemptively deny you coverage. Then there’s the ethnic cleansing of course. There will be religious people who will use it for marriage licenses or breeding permits.

  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Same thing that happened with NCIX’s personal information data, it probably goes to the highest bidder.