“Why are we paying a human being a six figure salary when an AI is 90% as good and we pay once for the entire company?”
And if it actually was 90% as good that would be a valid question, in reality however it is more like 9% as good with occasional downwards spikes towards 0.9%.
i’m willing to provide different sources and discussion if you object to that one for some reason but virtually all facets of research agree current artificial intelligence performance is nothing like what you are suggesting. what you’re claiming just isn’t true and you are spreading misinformation. it’s okay to be scared but it’s not okay to lie.
I am not scared, well, except scared that I will have to listen to AI scam BS for the next decade the same way I had to listen to blockchain/cryptocurrency scam BS for the last decade.
It is not that I haven’t tried the tools either. They just produce extremely horrible results every single time.
And if it actually was 90% as good that would be a valid question, in reality however it is more like 9% as good with occasional downwards spikes towards 0.9%.
you work in technology, presumably. so you’re supposedly an engineer of sorts.
what kind of engineer says obviously wrong statements based on their feelings?
i’m willing to provide different sources and discussion if you object to that one for some reason but virtually all facets of research agree current artificial intelligence performance is nothing like what you are suggesting. what you’re claiming just isn’t true and you are spreading misinformation. it’s okay to be scared but it’s not okay to lie.
I am not scared, well, except scared that I will have to listen to AI scam BS for the next decade the same way I had to listen to blockchain/cryptocurrency scam BS for the last decade.
It is not that I haven’t tried the tools either. They just produce extremely horrible results every single time.