Yes, indeed. Even agreed! Joking i was, poking some fun. All in jest, even the emoji couldn’t put the overly serious answers to rest!
Cuteness enjoyer.
- 1 Post
- 11 Comments
Debian users analyzing graphs in order to estimate when they can upgrade from really old software to slightly less old software 🤣
柊 つかさ@lemmy.worldto Linux@lemmy.ml•Atomic Linux Distros: What Barriers Stand Between You and Making the Switch?0·28 days agoI like fucking around and finding out. I also don’t like roll backs, real men only roll forwards :)
(don’t take that too seriously please)
Artix because it is more Arch then Arch according to Arch’s own goals: “focuses on simplicity, minimalism, and code elegance”. There is no way systemd is more simple, minimal and elegant than its alternatives. I don’t think systemd is bad, but I do think it is a bad fit and Artix is what Arch should have been.
Unless you have a particular reason for sticking to POSIX, who cares? I’ll take the user experience improvement without worry.
I like fish abbreviations. They are like aliases but expand when you press space or enter. That way you can edit it, and also still see the full command so you are less likely to forget it when you don’t have your aliases. Of course I have some scripts as well.
Is suckless surf small enough? https://surf.suckless.org/
柊 つかさ@lemmy.worldto Linux@lemmy.ml•Any APIs or apps that allow for complete keyboard navigation OS-wide, including inside apps0·6 months agoI don’t know of any. I do like keyboard based workflows so I have VimiumC in firefox which does what you want. A tiling window manager is the solution for the desktop environment part. The tricky part is navigating existing GUI apps.
They all work using macOS’ accessibility API which exposes UI elements for programmatic interaction.
Because linux doesn’t have a unified framework because of our freedom, things like this are very tricky if not practically infeasible (at least as far as I know).
柊 つかさ@lemmy.worldto Linux@lemmy.ml•Lemmy predicts: Chromebooks will become the new Thinkpads0·9 months agoI’m not a thinkpad guy, but I thought one reason for people liking old thinkpads is that the old ones came with cpu’s that predate the intel management engine.
I understand the problem of “code it yourself”. But if they won’t code it themselves, and it ought to exist, who has to? Everything that is provided is provided for free and with love and passion. If something is lacking in that there are only a few options. Including code it yourself or pay someone to code it for you. The only reason you get anything at all is because of the “code it yourself” attitude of the people who developed the software in the first place, as well as their willingness to share it.