Yeah. Lots of people didn’t vote because we had two evils. The greater evil won…
- 3 Posts
- 19 Comments
Thank you. This sent me on a rabbit hole of differences between LLC and Corporations. LLC being a pass through protects the owners a little bit but passes through all the tax and some of the liability (hence Limited Liability). I remember reading something about how banks got significantly more risky with investments and predatorily with their practices when they started moving from partnerships to corporate structures.
Maybe we should get rid of corporations and force all companies into a partnership or LLC structure. Less to hide behind.
I used to not vote because all politicians are evil. Someone pointed out that if everyone picks the lesser of two evils then things are going to get less evil. I’ve voted every opportunity since.
Corporations are just legal structure organizing people together to do something. The soup kitchen, local artisan, person cutting hair out of their house, they all set up an LLC to operate under. They didn’t instantly become evil.
But if I need to buy a blender, plywood, or underwear (my shopping list this weekend), I’m going to have to buy it from a corporation. If I could buy it from a less evil corp then hopefully I make things less evil.
Why was this downvoted? I just listed the companies on NAACP website so you didn’t have to open link.
Grocery stores have some good actors with employee owned and coops.
Yeah. Was surprised NAACP had them on their list but I suppose they still have DEI verbiage. But shady company (he types on his iPhone…)
Apple Ben and Jerry’s Costco Delta Airlines ELF Beauty
Yeah. That’s my local grocery store. It sounds like they treat their employees well and do a lot in the community. And tortillas.
I mean… is that union busting? I thought I read the union threatened to strike. Costco raised wages to advert a strike. Isn’t that just unions working as intended?
Lumberjacked@lemm.eeto Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•The best part of marriage is always having someone to scratch between your shoulder blades for you.0·2 months agoWashing dishes is the first thing that comes to mind. Foot rubs is another. I’m sure ill think of others
Lumberjacked@lemm.eeto Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•The best part of marriage is always having someone to scratch between your shoulder blades for you.0·2 months agoThere are other things of I can do with my own hands but is somehow better when done by my spouse.
Lumberjacked@lemm.eeOPto Fediverse@lemmy.world•Write.as or Micro.blog or ?? for migration of public profile from big corporate social mediaEnglish1·2 months agoAs soon as you think you know all the fediverse services out there…
Lumberjacked@lemm.eeOPto Fediverse@lemmy.world•Big-tech is evil but could Fediverse benefit from more small/medium for-profit companies?English3·2 months agoYes I think so. If they had an ad free versions I’d pay for it.
Lumberjacked@lemm.eeOPto Fediverse@lemmy.world•Big-tech is evil but could Fediverse benefit from more small/medium for-profit companies?English3·2 months agoWhat are they looking at doing for revenue?
Lumberjacked@lemm.eeOPto Fediverse@lemmy.world•Big-tech is evil but could Fediverse benefit from more small/medium for-profit companies?English1·2 months agoYeah but Valve is centralized ownership still. One guy has majority and that makes a difference. A coop could be customer led from get go. 51% customers 49% employees or something like that.
The point being if you structure it as for profit you can charge for things and build a good product. You can make rules that says 100% of the profits have to be redistributed and no one can change that. It’s how many farm co-ops work.
Lumberjacked@lemm.eeOPto Fediverse@lemmy.world•Big-tech is evil but could Fediverse benefit from more small/medium for-profit companies?English43·2 months agoYou could do a for profit without investors. Any profit goes back to employees and paying users. Make it the operating agreement from the get go and no one could come in.
Non profit in many places means you can’t sell a service. So you rely on donations. Which means you’re constantly asking for donations.
Lumberjacked@lemm.eeOPto Fediverse@lemmy.world•Big-tech is evil but could Fediverse benefit from more small/medium for-profit companies?English3·2 months agoThat’s hard. I like an algorithm I can control. Maybe could do ads in search only. I don’t know. Kind of hate ads.
Lumberjacked@lemm.eeOPto Fediverse@lemmy.world•Big-tech is evil but could Fediverse benefit from more small/medium for-profit companies?English72·2 months agoThink beyond VC backed companies. Those get tons of attention because they need it.
Investors = bad. I whole heartedly agree.
For profit doesn’t have to be bad. What if it were a worker/user co-op. Have a free product and have a paid product. If you pay for the product you get a (just one) vote. If you work for the company you get a vote. Users won’t vote for maximizing profit. But the profit means you don’t have to beg for donations.
Craigslist would be another example. For profit but no major investors so doesn’t have to prioritize profits.
Sorry. My underwear is beyond repair