while you were parroting AI sheep I was studying the blade ah comment

Do you think that human communication is more than statistical transformation of input to output?

Try asking ChatGPT if you’re confused

Oh no, not my public image!

The irony of focusing on my username when logical coherence is in question

Reality, where observation precedes perception

Not only is Steve right that ChatGPT writes better than the average person (which is indeed an elitist asshole take), ChatGPT has better logical reasoning than the average lemmy commenter

https://chatgpt.com/share/6837f656-b1b0-8008-ac31-d8858bd17da5

Thank you

None of this was true of copilot for years, but I stand corrected as for the current state of affairs

GitHub copilot is not chatgpt

What makes this a bullshit take? Focusing attention on actual problems is a great way to make progress

Please articulate why the premise of my argument is fundamentally flawed

No that is not how reasoned debate works, you have to articulate your argument lest you’re just sloppily babbling talking points

Basically no. What you’re calling tailored AI is actually low cost AI. You’ll be hard pressed, on the other hand, to get ChatGPT o3 to hallucinate at all

What exactly is the argument?

I don’t understand the nature of your question

1. Have you read the post?

2. If you’d like to refute the content on the grounds of another scientist, can you please provide a reference? I will read it

I don’t think this answers the question

What would Altman gain from overstating the environmental impact of his own company?

You should consider the possibility that CEOs of big companies essentially always think very hard about how to talk about everything so that it always benefits them

I can see the benefits, I can try to explain if you’re actually interested

This isn’t my article and yes that’s controlled for

I actually think that (presently) self hosted LLMs are much worse for hallucination