

GitHub copilot is not chatgpt
GitHub copilot is not chatgpt
What makes this a bullshit take? Focusing attention on actual problems is a great way to make progress
Please articulate why the premise of my argument is fundamentally flawed
No that is not how reasoned debate works, you have to articulate your argument lest you’re just sloppily babbling talking points
Basically no. What you’re calling tailored AI is actually low cost AI. You’ll be hard pressed, on the other hand, to get ChatGPT o3 to hallucinate at all
What exactly is the argument?
I don’t understand the nature of your question
Have you read the post?
If you’d like to refute the content on the grounds of another scientist, can you please provide a reference? I will read it
I don’t think this answers the question
What would Altman gain from overstating the environmental impact of his own company?
You should consider the possibility that CEOs of big companies essentially always think very hard about how to talk about everything so that it always benefits them
I can see the benefits, I can try to explain if you’re actually interested
This isn’t my article and yes that’s controlled for
I actually think that (presently) self hosted LLMs are much worse for hallucination
Do you hold Sam Altman’s opinion higher than the reasoning here? In general or just on this particular take?
Thank you for your considered and articulate comment
What do you think about the significant difference in attitude between comments here and in (quite serious) programming communities like https://lobste.rs/s/bxixuu/cheat_sheet_for_why_using_chatgpt_is_not
Are we in different echo chambers? Is chatgpt a uniquely powerful tool for programmers? Is social media a fundamentally Luddite mechanism?
Every time I see a comment like this I lost a little more faith in lemmy
No it doesn’t
This is a fucking wild take
Thank you
None of this was true of copilot for years, but I stand corrected as for the current state of affairs