I took an interest in this post and story, which I read, and found that while I appreciate the sentiment, there’s actually a lot of misinformation in the post itself.

Casa Tomada*
Brother and sister*
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casa_Tomada

Cortázar was not living abroad in 1946 when this was written. He wasn’t in France until 1951. In 1946, he worked at a university as a professor of French literature in Mendoza, Argentina, and was being outed by political pressure - this is more specifically what the story is probably about.

can you link?

I was daydreaming about this recently. Assuming the content wouldn’t be removed or suppressed (it would), what kind of information could be spread of platforms that would make the majority, most or even all people stop wanting to use it?

How do we liberate even the most captured consumers of the most terrible platforms?

Unfortunately, the master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house.

They want to outsource and privatize everything, lining their friends pockets and getting kickbacks. “Small government”, huge industrial complex contractor.

They want to outsource and privatize everything, lining their friends pockets and getting kickbacks. “Small government”, huge industrial complex contractor.

Maybe constant new outrage bait “content” drama has caused people to emulate it in real life at scale unconsciously?