

0·
8 months agoIt’s completely bonkers that JPEG-XL is as good as it is and no one wants to actually implement it into web browsers
don’t trust anyone who paid for twitter
watch my stupid youtube videos
It’s completely bonkers that JPEG-XL is as good as it is and no one wants to actually implement it into web browsers
It sounds stressful but it really isn’t. Just destroy random crates/dark plant things with the dark/light beam and you’ll have basically all the ammo you need.
People actually CLICK on ads??? Genuinely never had even an iota of desire to do that. I forgot it was even an option.
OBS is so good that I don’t know why anyone would ever use X-split.
Code spellcheck is a godsend
Basically smaller file sizes than JPEG at the same quality and it also automatically loads a lower quality version of the image before it loads a higher quality version instead of loading it pixel by pixel like an image would normally load. Google refuses to implement this tech into Chrome because they have their own avif format, which isn’t bad but significantly outclassed by JPEG-XL in nearly every conceivable metric. Mozilla also isn’t putting JPEG-XL into Firefox for whatever reason. If you want more detail, here’s an eight minute video about it.