lets just say his audience isn’t tech savy. But somehow they try Linux and like it. I think its definitely a win, because even non tech savvy can enjoy Linux.

Nope, not the west, asia

I am a Muslim, so Islam.

Youre going to short it?

Data information == metadata?

(2) a listing of all publicly available training data and where to obtain it; and (3) a listing of all training data obtainable from third parties and where to obtain it, including for fee.

imo this also includes “the data must be open”. The data used for training must be obtainable.

The description mentioned open source ai definition doesnt require data to be open. But https://opensource.org/ai/open-source-ai-definition explicitly require the data to be open?

Man this is a Bruh moment comment from me, My bad guys

So its activitypub, but worse because its designed from the ground up to be difficult to federate? Bro just use twitter at this point.

Honestly this is the thing I worry the most. Without having encryption as a first class citizen, the ux of the notes will be sacrificed greatly. Simply because good encryption tends to be slow, making the app unproductive imo.

I still don’t get their “privacy coin” based network. I think their luck would look a lot better if they use the existing tor network instead of lokinet.

based

Hmm if it comes to the age of a tech and its stability, I agree. I guess only time will tell. But do you have any suggestion for what this note taking format would look like? I personally think for non encrypted notes, foam’s implementation is on the right track.

the extension could cease to exist, but you can absolutely still access your notes with any text editor decades from now. I still don’t get where the “non-future proof” here. Can’t really be more future proof than a simple text file.

Arguably, open document format, although standardized, are harder to open and manage because it’s far more complex than a text file that ends with .md.

Its future proof tho? Markdown has a standard (or at least a common implementation) and foam is just a tool to automate and graph all the boring parts?

If you really want to be future proof and interoperable, I suggest you to use something like a git repository + vscode + foam (https://github.com/foambubble/foam). All of the tech is open source and relatively easy to use, especially if you already know git.

Treedome on the other hand can be abandoned. It can be swallowed by the sands of time. It uses a custom file format after all. But because of its open-source nature, as long as you have the code, you can open the notes. But that’s a good idea, to be able to export to a plaintext file. You could make a request here if you want https://codeberg.org/solver-orgz/treedome/issues

is it this one https://bazzite.gg/? Does it have .deb support? Because if so, you can install it easily because i release it with .deb and nix. If not, you can always compile it yourself using the docs here https://codeberg.org/solver-orgz/treedome/src/branch/master/docs/development/development-setup.md. Please make an issue in the repo if you have any suggestion on improving the docs.

Sure its secure, but is it verifiably secure?