

0·
11 days agoPrivatize gains, socialize losses. The CapitalistTM way!
Ottawa Resident Creator and Mod of https://lemmy.ca/c/ottawa
Privatize gains, socialize losses. The CapitalistTM way!
Why not make automated trains with their own dedicated right of way?
Plus with XAI (from sitter) it will be the CCP XI stack.
Can you redo the image to match OP?
I thought it was the sun reflecting off the mirror of the truck not the sun going through the window and shooting out the headlights.
No wonder. You have a 26 day old account. Welcome to the world, babyface.
Edit: I can see why this can be seen as poor taste. Wasn’t trying to be mean. Obviously account age != actual age. Was making it in jest.
It looks like Paraguay needs a Luigi 🟢.
I think you’re missing the general point.
In the cases you’ve described, having automated semis would not be feasible. Automated cars already have a hard time in San Fran and AZ cities with smooth asphalt as it is.
The places where automated semis make the most sense, i.e. large, well maintained highways connecting large urban centres, can be better served with automated railways.
The engineering is much simpler, fewer degrees of freedom and a much more constrained problem space (and hence constrained solution space), for automated railways than highways. Creating a safer environment for all. Also not having to deal with semis as an individual driver.
Railways (funded through private investment): https://www.aar.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/AAR-Rail-Network-Map-2025-1.jpg.webp
Highways (publicly owned, operated, maintained): https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/images/nhs.pdf
There is some good coverage with railroads, but as you said not nearly extensive as the public road network. But I bet you the vast majority (above 60%) are along corridors with railways. However two big hurdles need to be overcome, greater investment in throughput capacity and the fact that trucks can go from ware house to ware house.
However both issues can be solved.