I can’t help you but I just came here to say that I also very much dislike the trend that everything has to look flat. Imho visual, simulated depth (through shadows, gradients, etc.) can make UIs look actually much cleaner, because hierarchy, grouping of elements and differentiation between buttons/text inputs and non-interactive elements is often much more obvious on first sight.
- 0 Posts
- 7 Comments
words_number@programming.devto Programmer Humor@programming.dev•libmem_cpy-strnrrn-std-clib_Cmvaeffc_ld-TWA_nif.aarch64(32bit)2-0.13.2-23.2.so.7(3).1.1.gz.conf0·2 years agoSeriously though, why? Is there historic reasons for that? Did they have to pay extra for more letters back in the day?
words_number@programming.devto Programming@programming.dev•What are your programming hot takes?0·2 years agoJS is horse shit. Instead of trying to improve it or using that high level scripting language as a compilation target (wtf?!), we should deprecate it entirely and put all efforts into web assembly.
Um actually… Opera and Edge weren’t always based on chromium!
I really wonder how americans were able to fuck this one up. There are three ways to arrange these and two of them are acceptable!
Edit: Yes, I meant common ways, not combinatorically possible ways.
Of course I like doggos <3
Fun fact (made up based on personal experience): Most cat persons also like dogs but most dog persons don’t like cats. So cat people are generally more reasonable human beings.
It’s unsafe, not renewable, not independent from natural resources (which might not be present in your country, so you need to buy from dictators) and last but not least crazy expensive.