When the 3 1/4-in floppy camera came out I wanted one. It was not in my budget. But a decade and a half ago a friend gave me one. It worked. It came with two batteries and three floppies.

Yesterday a different friend gave me one as well. It came with one battery. That battery is the same as the other batteries.

I went from a person who couldn’t afford anything back in the day to a person who’s just being handed these priceless artifacts.

They both work. The only device I can read the disk on are the cameras themselves because I have no floppy drives.

Sony Mavica FD91 and FD81

  • adarza@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    i got floppy drives and cables, and at least a couple vintage minitowers with them here… but alas, no epic floppy disk cameras.

  • hOrni@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    OP needs a floppy drive. Who has one they don’t use and can give it to OP?

    • betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’ve still got one hooked up to a machine that’s old enough to vote. Worked last time I used it too but it’s been about 5 years since then. OP could send me the diskette like I’m one of those mail-in photo development studios from the days of ubiquitous film cameras. Gotta upgrade the printer first though and I hate dealing with printers.

    • FauxPseudo @lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t have a tower to put the poppy drive in. I’d rather make sure that these end up in a good home.

  • blueamigafan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    My first job was working in a camera shop in the mid 00’s these were just about still for sale, and I hated them because people would buy them because of the floppy disk, see that at 2 megapixel they could only hold a couple of pictures so would then down the resolution to fit more on a disk and then come storming into us a week or so later because we ‘ruined’ their holiday photos or whatever because they were taking them at the lowest resolution and would be a grainy mess.

  • Blackout@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I used the one of the left for work. I did photography and display ads at the local newspaper. Once a week I went to the local car dealers with the Sony to take side profile shots of their cars. The entire sales staff would drive them by on at a time. I’d do the pre press on my Macintosh. For anything else I still grabbed my Nikon and film.

  • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I borrowed one (I can’t even tell you what the make/model was) in the early 2000s. The pics were OK, but the thing took forever to save; there was no quick shooting by pressing the button again.

  • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I have a funny story about a Sony Mavica.

    My family bought one when it was becoming obsolete, on deep duscount, I forget from where. We used the crap outta that thing, and when we became internet savvy, used it as a way to upload pictures to the computer for eBay listings. Eventually we replaced it with a digital camera that used an SD card, and in its little protective case the mavica went, to rest.

    2 decades later, I find it while cleaning out old boxes, found that it still worked perfectly (thanks to using standard AA’s), and decided to sell it on eBay.

    It sits up there for a while at $20, until one day I get a message about it, asking if the screen was okay or sum such. I tell them it is, and shortly after they buy it.

    Out of mild curiosity, I click on the buyer’s profile, and see that he sells stuff as well, and it’s a very old account, about as old as mine. The pictures for the items he currently had for sale are pretty grainy, and I thought… Surely not…

    I download a picture of one of his items, and sure enough; it’s the same resolution as the mavica takes, 640 by something.

    That crazy bastard had been steadily using his Sony Mavica floppy disk camera for over 20 years for his little eBay business.

    I suspected that his camera must’ve finally given up the ghost, and he spotted my prime example and bought it so he could continue his well worn routine.

    He left me positive feedback for the Mavica, and I suppose he’s still using it to this day, keeping that old equipment alive.

    As a fan of the brave little toaster, it nearly brings a tear to the eye… I just really hope he switched to rechargeable batteries at some point, the little floppy drive on it chewed through them quick.

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    And now, these days my camera would require 20-30 floppies to store a single image

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        At this point, we are talking about the storage media, not the camera.

          • stoy@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I have an excellent backpack, a Thinktank BackStory 15, I do not blame it in the slightest!

            • tetris11@lemmy.ml
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              A poor musician sometimes notices that their guitar has a rattlesnake in it

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yay, I get to store 7 photos on one 250 drive!

        I just need to bring a sherpa with me to carry 215 disks for a normal outing, should only weigh 11kg

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    These were horrible cameras that sold like crazy back then. Because a diskette only held 1.44MB and the write speed of floppies was so slow, Sony compresses the hell out of the images to that you can fit a higher number of images on a diskette and so that they write to the diskette quick enough to take the next picture.

    The result was really poor quality images out of these on the settings that everyone used.

    • thehatfox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      These Mavicas could become popular again now as retro tech. There’s a lo-fi aesthetic growing in photo and video that’s all about compression artefacts and old image sensors. Physical media and its inconveniences is also having a moment as a novelty and maybe even a broader movement.

    • MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Can confirm, had one on semi-perma-loan for a few years. Bought a secondhand Canon from a friend and never looked back.

  • Fondots@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I remember my 4th grade teacher having one of these and showing it off around 2000, it may have been the first digital camera I ever saw.

    Blew my mind back then.

    He was one of my favorite teachers, really into science, loved gadgets. He was an older guy who retired a few years later and I heard he wasn’t in the best of health, no idea if he’s still around, but I hope he at least lived long enough to appreciate how far digital cameras have come since then.

  • Lembot_0002@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    In the times when floppies started to die out we had external USB floppy drives. I’m sure you would be able to find one if you wish.

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      http://camera-wiki.org/wiki/Sony_Mavica_FD91

      The maximum image resolution was 1024×768 pixels, and like the pioneering Mavica FD5 and FD7 it used standard 3.5" computer floppy disks for storage. At the maximum image-quality settings, a 1.4 MB floppy can store about eight images. With its ungainly body design and image quality lagging even its 1998 peers[1], the FD91 is mostly a curiosity today.

  • Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Assume you meant 3 1/2" floppies? Seems like you’re confusing these with the 5 1/4" size.

  • slippyferret@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    The Sony Mavica FD91 was the first digital camera I ever owned! I used it the last couple years of high school and during a short homestay in Japan. You could pick up a giant box of 3.5" floppies for cheap, and as long as you fed it a stead supply of batteries it worked pretty well.

    Here are some photos I took that are at, I believe, the highest quality setting (1024 x 768 and about 170kb each). Though I think Lemmy shows them shrunk down in the feed, if you open the image in a new tab you can see the full resolution.

    Zoomed in.

    And a closeup.

    The 14x optical zoom was pretty amazing back then.

  • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    My dad used one of these for work when I was a a kid and I used to play with it all the time. He hated technology so he kept using it far beyond its reasonable lifespan. I remember I was in college and he was still using it, so it was like 2006 at that point?

    Eventually the something got messed up somehow (image sensor?) and every picture was written to the disk incorrectly in a way that the right half would have fucked up color data. He finally got a normal point and shoot that took significantly higher quality images and could now store more than like 20 images without having to drag around 20 delicate floppy disks through sites filled with things very hostile to floppy disks