Technically, everyone that doesn’t identify as “men”. But it’s done in the abstract, negative space of the message by not saying it. Subtle, but without clarifying things, it’s left open to this interpretation.
I don’t see how your argument is anything other than “Memes about men aren’t inclusive. What about everyone else?”
The fact that men are privileged overall doesn’t mean they don’t have issues. Acknowledging those issues but requiring an additional acknowledgement that other groups exist and have issues is the same thing as ‘all lives matter’.
Who does it exclude?
Technically, everyone that doesn’t identify as “men”. But it’s done in the abstract, negative space of the message by not saying it. Subtle, but without clarifying things, it’s left open to this interpretation.
Do you also complain that gay pride and black history month aren’t inclusive of everyone?
Hardly. I added some clarification to my argument.
I don’t see how your argument is anything other than “Memes about men aren’t inclusive. What about everyone else?”
The fact that men are privileged overall doesn’t mean they don’t have issues. Acknowledging those issues but requiring an additional acknowledgement that other groups exist and have issues is the same thing as ‘all lives matter’.
It isn’t inclusive of everyone because it is about a specific group. I’m getting ‘all lives matter’ vibes from your comment.
Thanks for clarifying. I’m actually trying to argue the exact opposite of something like “all lives matter”.