• Cryxtalix@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    For most of the article, I was wondering why people cared so much about some random network, they’ll go to the trouble of searching for and writing suggestions about it. People usually aren’t that interested in the network infrastructure at government facilities.

    That’s some pretty significant context the writer didn’t even know until informed by a reader.

  • Maeve@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Still, the ambassador had nothing on senior enlisted crew members of the littoral combat ship USS Manchester, who didn’t like the Navy’s restriction of onboard Internet access. In 2023, they decided that the best way to deal with the problem was to secretly bolt a Starlink terminal to the “O-5 level weatherdeck” of a US warship. They called the resulting Wi-Fi network “STINKY”—and when officers on the ship heard rumors and began asking questions, the leader of the scheme brazenly lied about it. Then, when exposed, she went so far as to make up fake Starlink usage reports suggesting that the system had only been accessed while in port, where cybersecurity and espionage concerns were lower. Rather unsurprisingly, the story ends badly, with a full-on Navy investigation and court-martial. Still, for half a year, life aboard the Manchester must have been one hell of a ride.

    But wait! There’s more!

  • VantaBrandon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    #1 African scammer who would sell out “his country” for the price of X premium has a backdoor to all military infra, Xi is getting a chubby

  • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    i was wondering why would you choose such a stupid WiFi access point name, then I read that it was Elon musk that decided that the default starlink AP name has to be that stupid so people would change it

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      My ISP gave me an access point called CSP218891F Which I’m rather worried about.

  • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Here’s the meat and potatoes of the article.

    In 2023, they decided that the best way to deal with the problem was to secretly bolt a Starlink terminal to the “O-5 level weatherdeck” of a US warship.

    They called the resulting Wi-Fi network “STINKY”—and when officers on the ship heard rumors and began asking questions, the leader of the scheme brazenly lied about it. Then, when exposed, she went so far as to make up fake Starlink usage reports suggesting that the system had only been accessed while in port, where cybersecurity and espionage concerns were lower.

    Rather unsurprisingly, the story ends badly, with a full-on Navy investigation and court-martial.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      when officers on the ship heard rumors

      Lol not only is this an incredible violation of security, they couldn’t even keep their fucking mouths shut about it.

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Between Trump stealing national security secrets and shit like this, it’s honestly shocking the USA hasn’t already become a full-fledged fascist hell-hole. It’s currently only half-fledged.

    But seriously, it must be fucking child’s play for other nations to spy on us with dumb fucking shit like this happening.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Oh it’s the same with other countries too. We all regularly have breaches due to the dumbest shit. Just ask the War Thunder community. It’s about time for them to have another one.

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Hey, give us a chance. We have another election right around the corner and things are really looking good for a solid commitment to fully flegged hell-holism.

    • 0x0@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Ya mean like ppl using classified information in World of Tanks forums to prove a point… more than once?

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    And I’m sure whoever put it there faced way more harsher penalties than a certain someone who willfully hid highly classified documents in his bathroom for months and lied about it to investigators.

    • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Just like a certain someone who had classified documents that they weren’t even supposed to have without a handler!

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      According to Navy Times, reduction in rank. According to my experience, likely going to be told they can’t re-enlist after the end of their current term. Likely shipped stateside and in charge of mowing the lawn somewhere.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I feel like every military is full of technological babies acting out security theatre with each other while everything is totally hacked.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Probably not for the reason you think.

      Like, it wouldn’t be patched into anything official

      But it means Musk knew where that ship was 24/7, and I’m pretty sure that’s why Ukraine’s military stopped using it. Musk tipped off Putin to troop movements.

      • potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Musk tipped off Putin to troop movements

        Wait he did? Can you provide a source for this? I can only find information about him stopping starlink service in crimea

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          What?

          Surface ships are in constant communication with stuff…

          You can’t just find a signal in the middle of the ocean. Musk can find a starlink signal tho, because he can see what Starlink connects to and it’s gps location.

          • 4am@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Yeah but if they go on mission and “go dark” then you still have this starlink thing that may or may not be disabled by the person smuggling it on board. It may also be connected to official things if the owner has bad intentions, or if someone else who does finds it and co-opts it.

            There is a lot that could go wrong with unauthorized radio transmission equipment on a warship, and not all of it is obvious.

            • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              You can’t connect a star link to siprnet.

              The worst a bad actor could do is constantly transmitting location and other combat data.

              • ggppjj@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                You can’t connect a star link to siprnet.

                Can you connect a computer? Because if so, that same computer can then be connected to the starlink, no?

                I know absolutely nothing about secure government networking, I’m just kind of assuming that something has to be able to connect to both individually and also simultaneously.

                • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  sipr is very strict about what it is letting connect to it. Which is why you rarely hear about breaches. Notable incidents like Manning or Snowden both involved usage of physical media, which has been severely restricted since. Plus Snowden was an admin, and not on SIPRNet, but some NSA systems.

                  To add, SIPRNet is entirely isolated from NIPRNet or the Internet.

          • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            You say that like Elon is personally looking at that information.

            Presumably, there would be a large number of people at the company with access to that information, all of whom could be bribed or otherwise persuaded to share it.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            No they actually do go dark sometimes for exactly this reason. Of course there’s always some signal source but it’s the difference between lighting up like a Christmas tree and running a single IR light.

          • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Depends on where your sensors are and how much dispersion the dish has. If you are flying a surveillance plane into the “beam” then you can passively spot the ship.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          No it just wouldn’t.

          Like, are you imagining a modern US warship doesn’t have internet 24/7?

          This was for porn and maybe streaming services and social media, but mostly porn.

          It wasn’t for any official use, because they have that covered.

          You’re acting like surface ships are submarines…

          • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Like, are you imagining a modern US warship doesn’t have internet 24/7?

            last I checked, no, they don’t. they had shitty service while in port, and not much else.

            https://www.navytimes.com/news/your-navy/2023/12/29/new-in-2024-better-wi-fi-for-sailors/

            fuck mate they only recently started giving their people access ON SHORE.

            https://www.stripes.com/branches/navy/2024-01-25/navy-free-wi-fi-pilot-program-12796438.html

            so no, I don’t think for the average sailor a US warship provides internet access 24/7

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              That article is about wifi for personal use…

              And the second one is about it being free and you’re acting like they didn’t have Internet before then?

              so no, I don’t think for the average sailor a US warship provides internet access 24/7

              Yeah man, you have zero idea what people are talking about about.

              • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                That article is about wifi for personal use…

                do you think the starlink terminal in the OP article was for military use?? bwahahaha

                Yeah man, you have zero idea what people are talking about about.

                ok buddy, have a nice life.

                • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I said:

                  This was for porn and maybe streaming services and social media, but mostly porn.

                  And on your second reply you said:

                  do you think the starlink terminal in the OP article was for military use?? bwahahaha

                  I stand by my original assessment after your first comment:

                  Yeah man, you have zero idea what people are talking about

                  Because you literally don’t understand the conversation

          • vortic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Whether they have wifi on ship or not isn’t the issue. Sometimes, when a ship goes into an operation, they will turn off all signals except passive or directed signals so that they can’t easily be detected. Having a communications signal that isn’t under the control of the ship’s officers is a huge security risk during operations.

            Someone is going to be court martialed over this.

      • Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        The reason I think is because any unofficial and potentially unsecured communications access point seems like a vulnerability. If some moron posts a picture using that unofficial access point I’d be worried it could be traced to the ship’s location.

      • realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Musk tipped off Putin to troop movements.

        I’m sorry, this made me laugh. Is that a widely accepted conspiracy theory in this community? That Elon Musk is a Russian spy?

        • Cadeillac@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Did you miss the part where he sent a militarized Cyber Truck to a Russian war criminal, or are you conveniently ignoring it?

          • BestTestInTheWest@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            The Russian war criminal stated he got it from musk but that hasn’t been confirmed and I don’t think we should be taking Kadyrov’s word as truth on anything he’s a literal war criminal.

      • Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Everybody knew were the ship was, because at that time star link usage by area was shown publicly. There was map online that showed all clients online.

  • pop@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    must’ve been a Russian psyops. USA isn’t that incompetent in itself. oh wait…

    It doesn’t stop wanks from blaming it on Putin, still. LMAO

  • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    can we just fucking all take a break for a month? just have things go to being boring?

    I attended a fucking ethics of ai talk at my work, only to run into a fucking knockoff nazi complaining about the founding fathers images being generated with black people, and talking about how silicon valley is too left wing.

    either you’re so stupid that you don’t understand it’s a fucking alt-right dog whistle, or you’re a fucking nazi who gets very, very upset if you see a black person in any context. Either way, just shut the fuck up.