BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 10 months agoAntinatalism Rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square95linkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down10
arrow-up12arrow-down1imageAntinatalism Rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneBluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square95linkfedilink
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·10 months agoMy point is that the whole premise of “consent for existing” is bogus.
minus-squareretrieval4558@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 months agoAnd how does that relate to angels?
My point is that the whole premise of “consent for existing” is bogus.
And how does that relate to angels?