That’s not how you throw something though

The stick route is probably the easiest.

I’d go Chrome over Fire though- easier to mod and side load things.

Not defending YouTube here, but CPR is so time sensitive that if they were looking up instructions, she was a goner anyway.

I’m betting fake. The artist is holding the tattoo machine weirdly close to their offhand, which makes me think they’re trying to obscure that it’s not actually laying the ink.

Aren’t you just such a smart, special, edgy boy

I can’t access my Jellyfin library right now because the backend is apparently too old (wtf).

Are you using the binhex image by any chance? I had this same problem, just had to update it from the apps/community center page instead of from the docker page.

Women are the best of the best of the best of the best of the best of the best…

Not sure if this is really what you’re looking for but I have pihole at home, then tailscale so my phone always gets the benefit.

Because the typical standard of consent is that in order to do something to someone, you should have informed consent. If you cannot obtain that, then you do not do the thing. Something that does not exist cannot give informed consent, therefore you should not do the thing.

If living organisms are predisposed to prefer existence, this would imply existence is an inherently preferable state.

It usually is- to a living organism, which is not what we’re talking about.

Prove it

Come on bro you can’t be serious about this.

They are not related because you have to exist to experience well-being or “bad-being”. What I’m talking about is consenting to exist.

And how does that relate to angels?

Just to clarify, I’m not advocating for any baby to be taken off life support, that’s a pretty abhorrent thing to accuse me of, if that’s what you meant.

I work in critical care and routinely bring people back from the brink of death. With a living being, unless otherwise stated, their consent to life saving treatment is implied, and I’m happy to give it.

Philosophically, I’m just not convinced that there is such a thing as an implied consent to “make me exist when I don’t exist already”.

That’s just how evolution works- something that already exists and is driven to stay alive is more likely to pass on its genetics than something that is not driven to stay alive. This fact has nothing to do with the philosophy of consenting to exist in the first place.

Edit: missed your first question. Something that does not exist cannot desire.

If my understanding of longtermism is correct, it’s more of a function of utilitarianism. If one wants to do the most good for the most people, then it makes some amount of sense to focus on the far future where presumably there will be more people. Their consent is irrelevant, which is kind of the opposite of what I’m saying, which is that consent is relevant.

I’m not sure what your point is here

Nothing, unless they start existing.

Something that no one has discussed in this highly enlightened conversation here is the issue of consent. A person cannot consent to being born. Full stop. I don’t know of a way around that besides ignoring it.

It’s not “misleading,” because the vast majority of people understand what the current colloquial use of crypto is.

Absolutely not.

You should be able to burn flags anywhere, not just in a designated area.