• MTK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Well, your last example kind of falls apart, you do have electric collars and they do work well, they just have to be complimentary to positive enforcement (snacks usually) but I get your point :)

    • cynar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Shock collars are awful for a lot of training. It’s the equivalent to your boss stabbing you in the arm with a compass every time you make a mistake. Would it work, yes. It would also cause merry hell for staff retention. As well as the risk of someone going postal on them.

      • MTK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I highly disagree, some dogs are too reactive for or reacy badly to other methods. You also compare it to something painful when in reality 90% of the time it does not hurt the animal when used correctly.

        • cynar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          As the owner of a reactive dog, I disagree. It takes longer to overcome, but gives far better results.

          I also put vibration collars and shock collars in 2 very different categories. A vibration collar is intended to alert the dog, in an unambiguous manner, that they need to do something. A shock collar is intended to provide an immediate, powerfully negative feedback signal.

          Both are known as “shock collars” but they work in very different ways.