qweertz (they/she)

tech-savy geek and queer disaster
(I also hate capitalism and have a general interest in social sciences)

my links

  • 0 Posts
  • 23 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: January 5th, 2024

help-circle







  • Bc this seems to be a crosspost, imma cross-comment:

    I get wanting to phase out Mercurial in favour of git. But why did they have to choose Github T_T

    Ideally they would have just hosted a their own Frgejo instance (heck, a Gitlab one would have been much better FFS). Even just using Codeberg and donating would have been better

    The for-profit side of Mozilla seems to have succeeded in purging most of the principles Mozilla used to have (IK they have been eroding over the years and sometimes been too “pragmatic”, this is just the cherry on top of a long series of shitpiles)

    If Mozialla actually stood for a free/libre future they’d push Forgejo to the lvl they need it to be (if it already isn’t capable of all that stuff. Haven’t rly interacted much with it). Since they will still keep the CI/CD on Mercurial for now, there is even less valid reasons for using Github…

    https://programming.dev/comment/16918830



  • Doesn’t seem like anyone mentioned it yet, so I’m gonna chime in: Bluefin-DX by Universalblue might be worth a look.

    It’s a special developer version of their already interesting and rock solid atomic distro, meaning it’s not rly meant that you do much with the OS part of the filesystem (I’d recommend you read up on it, since I xan’t explain it that well) It has VSCode preinstalled (you can replace it with VSCodium tho with a simple command IIRC) and allows you to doing up virtually endless Linux environments where you install your additional programmes that aren’t available as a Flatpak (you can still use them in the CLI, DW)



  • Every time this licenses comes up I have to repeat myself: It’s “open source washing” at it’s fines, trying to sell proprietary (freeware) software as something open

    From an old comment of mine:

    that’s the thing though, it strips you of the options the four essential freedoms provide.

    and imo it’s not rly an argument. Libre software is free as in freedom and not necessarily free as in beer. You could license it under the (A)GPL, charge for downloads in the Play store or for compiled binaries on ur website and ask for donations on F-Droid.

    You could even do a freemium version where some features are locked in the binaries you distribute and need a license from ur website or smth (for those who don’t want to use Google Play). (iirc SD Maid 2/SE does this)

    sauce

    E.g. the QT project (which I don’t particularly like) is dual licensed, making it both Foss that ppl have to contribute back to and viable as a for-profit






  • I (unfortunately) have to heavily recommend against using Nobara, especially if you have an Nvidia graphics card. It’s an amateur distribution in the original sense of the word and also lacks a large community, neither does it have a company behind it.

    This leads to a lack of proper QA and testing in general. It’s OK but I would not recommend it to anyone

    If you want to go with a “traditional” distro, go with Linux Mint, simply the most solid out there. I’d also recommend you check out Bluefin, it’s atomic (meaning that you are basically guaranteed to always have a working system, even after upgrades) and quite modern