And they’re already kissing Trump’s ass

  • peanutyam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Be better if it was just banned worldwide period and the “TikTok influencer” crowd can go get real jobs and perhaps users can improve their attention spans again.

    yawn

  • deathbird@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Of course they’re kissing Trump’s ass. How else is anyone gonna get anything done in the next 4 years? American democracy is broken, and under unitary executive theory endorsed by all branches of government the President is basically a king with term limits and no shiny hat. It’s no way to run a country, but it’s where we’re at so why would we expect TikTok to do anything else?

  • sunglocto@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I know bad for democracy and everything but

    This app has done nothing positive for my life, arguably began my social media addiction, filled my brain with negative content at the height of COVID and severely impacted my mental health

    I don’t think governments should ban platforns. But do I think TikTok should have ever existed? No

    • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      If not for TikTok Israel’s genocide would have gone unreported in Western media and censored on US social media.

      • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I don’t use TikTok but I knew plenty about Israel’s actions. It was all over the internet and plenty of news sources.

        • ScoopMcPoops@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yeah because teens love opening the paper in the morning and reading about how Israel is “liberating” Palestine?

    • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      It helped my spouse deal with medical trauma by finding content creators expressing similar experiences. It worked better than any of the support groups which often felt more hopeless and isolating.

      At this point though my spouse just hates instagram reels and how chaotic and pointless this is shaking out to be.

    • ubergeek@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I dunno. Thanks to Black creators there, I learned about Tulsa, Rosewood, a lot about America indigenous culture, learned about the cops city protests and actions…

      Sounds like TikTok was very good for democracy.

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I find Tiktok haters funny. Vast majority aren’t users, and when you do find a user and they disparage the content, it’s pretty obvious that it’s a them problem and not a tiktok problem.

        If you want tiktok to be cooking videos, just like nothing but cooking videos. If you want it to be about palestine, then like that content. If you want to be in MAGAtok, well that exists too. If you see nothing but thirst traps, that’s because those are the videos you actually fully watch. Your fyp page is just a mirror into yourself.

        The only haters I can agree with are the ones who say “too many ads”

    • Senseless@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      And yet most of it’s users are either to stupid or addicted to see the issue and just switch to RedNote, no questions asked. Which in turn nullifies the ban altogether.

      • sunglocto@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        it is a me problem

        you want to subject yourself to doomscrolling and unresticted data collection? go ahead. i dont give 2 shits

        • PunnyName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yes, it’s a you problem that you can’t control how you interact with your glass rectangle.

      • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        170 million people

        Where’s that number coming from. Maybe you mean the 165 billion installs , but that’s not active users and double counts people installing on multiple devices. Tik tok has 50 million dau Of those maybe 10% is actually “speaking” and creating content that the other 90% consume so around 5 million people.

        And those 5 million people aren’t silenced, they can still go on to one of multiple apps that provide the same service and allows them to get there message out. He’ll they could come on to the fediverse and post blatant ccp propaganda and no one will do anything.

    • brendansimms@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Same! It is definitively unconstitutional and the us gov just pushed it through anyway (with even supreme court backing it up?!) Shit is crazy, and yet I see a lot of ‘no big loss’ type comments on it.

        • Traister101@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          The law boiled down says any applications from Rushia or China are inherently a security risk and therefore can be banned no questions asked (currently they have to go app by app) which to put it simply is extremely concerning. Straight up US great firewall type shit

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Not all apps, review/travel sites get a pass, and the decision is left to the president, which is a dumb way to do it.


            DIVISION H-- PROTECTING AMERICANS FROM FOREIGN ADVERSARY CONTROLLED APPLICATIONS ACT

            Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act

            (Sec. 2) This division prohibits distributing, maintaining, updating, or providing internet hosting services for a foreign adversary controlled application (e.g., TikTok). However, the prohibition does not apply to a covered application that executes a qualified divestiture as determined by the President.

            Under the division, a foreign adversary controlled application is an application directly or indirectly operated by (1) ByteDance, Ltd., TikTok, their subsidiaries, successors, related entities they control, or entities controlled by a foreign adversary country; or (2) a social media company that is controlled by a foreign adversary country and determined by the President to present a significant threat to national security. (Here, a social media company excludes any website or application primarily used to post product reviews, business reviews, or travel information and reviews.)

      • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        The SCOTUS decision was wild too, because it was a fucking 9-0 vote. The decision was unanimous. That’s a word that’s virtually never used to describe the SCOTUS or any kind of government vote. That unanimous decision made it perfectly clear that the government knows something we don’t, and that TikTok had them fucking terrified. My bet is on the genocide being much worse than even TikTok was showing, but TikTok was the only place you could see anything about it that didn’t have a massive “Israel is just helping them root out terrorists” spin.

      • PunnyName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        You think silencing half the entire population of the country is boomer lib shit?

        Ok, boomer.

  • RazTheCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m starting to think of Trump as one of those old school firefighters that would set fires and then swoop in to put the fire out lol.

    • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Except it doesn’t have the capability to put out fires, so it just starts them, then declares having put them out and leaves them burning

    • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      He was one of the first people saying to ban it in 2020. To me it’s more like he is easily swayed with lobbying so it ends up looking like he is a pioneer on pushing new policy when in actuality he is the first person people go to when they need to bribe a politician.

    • dx1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah, but the ban passed with overwhelming bipartisan support, randomly jammed inside of the global military spending package including funding the Ukrainian war effort and the genocide in Gaza (which is a must-support bill for Democrats and Republicans alike I guess).

  • drthunder@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I wish people knew that TikTok being banned was more about it not suppressing posts about Palestine than national security or whatever else they say. Antony Blinken and Mitt Romney outright said last year it was about stopping people from seeing the truth about Israel committing genocide. If the government actually cared about foreign influence operations they’d regulate data privacy and social media algorithms in some way (idk how, but I’m sure you could) but they obviously won’t because US companies manipulating people and stealing their data is totally fine.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      If that were true then they wouldn’t have given ByteDance the option to sell 80% to citizens and continue operating.

      The law also bans every company from doing the same thing, sending personal data to any of the listed adversarial nations or being more than 20% owned by them. Why ban every company if they only cared about the Palestine message?

      • dx1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        If that were true then they wouldn’t have given ByteDance the option to sell 80% to citizens and continue operating.

        Except the entire point of that is the U.S. ownership would succumb to that pressure.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          *U.S. Citizen Ownership

          Because yeah, Chinese Military ownership is problematic for an app used by US Citizens.

          • dx1@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Oh, now it’s owned by the Chinese military?

            Which part of “freedom of speech” involves precluding us from ingesting content from a country our government decided it doesn’t like? Or electing to send our own device data or interactions to that country?

      • Robust Mirror@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        So how are a ton of people going to red note? Shouldn’t that have been banned a long time ago if they ban every company?

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Probably difficult to enforce if RedNote doesn’t have American servers or offices, we will see if anything happens.

      • drthunder@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Making ByteDance sell 80% to US companies is a win for the powers that be because then that too can be manipulated by right-wing oligarchs.

        I don’t trust Chinese companies all that much either, but Mitt Romney outright said this was about Palestine, you can see another reply of mine below with a link.

    • firadin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      How did you go from “foreign influence operations” to “US companies manipulating people”

      • drthunder@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Facebook and YouTube have for years boosted conservative people and posts/videos: this is fine according to the powers that be.

        Russia and no doubt countless others run influence operations through all US social media companies: this is also fine according to the powers that be.

        China probably runs influence operations through a Chinese social media company: this is a national security problem that needs to be dealt with!!

        The reasons TikTok is maybe being banned are because it’s the only major social media that isn’t suppressing pro-Palestine speech and because it’s not owned by a right-wing US oligarch. Musk is the shadow president, Zuckerberg is blatantly sucking up to Trump, etc etc.

      • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        No one is enforcing it, it’s a play by TikTok. TikTok did it voluntarily. The server is still there, my wife logged in and saw the notice.

        It’s just theater.

        • Zagorath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          No one is enforcing it, it’s a play by TikTok. TikTok did it voluntarily

          Yup. In fact, Biden had specifically said he will not enforce the ban.

          Which, incidentally…might be the same thing Trump does to “unban TikTok” once he takes office. Which is bizarre, on both sides. Like…that’s literally not legal for a president to do. They can’t legally just ignore an Act of Congress.

          Not that the law matters in America anymore. The Supreme Court has pretty definitively seen to that.

          • adarza@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            enforcement is up to the ag, so yea. they could just ‘ignore’ the law.

            the only thing the ‘president’ can do is extend the deadline by 90 days given evidence that the company is closing-in on a deal.

            with scotus out of the way, ruling in favor of trump’s initial desires, and that which subsequently passed through congress; it is now up to congress to undo the legislation if they so choose.

            • Zagorath@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              enforcement is up to the ag, so yea. they could just ‘ignore’ the law.

              In practice, there’s no real mechanism to force it (especially if Congress is unwilling to impeach & convict). But legally speaking, the Take Care clause of the constitution obligates the President (through his executive) to enforce all laws passed by Congress. Ignoring it would be unconstitutional.

              • Kalysta@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                When has trump ever cared about the constution?

                You’re talking about the guy who wants to end birthright citizenship.

        • vala@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          $10 says Trump influenced TikTok to go dark today to make him look better when it turns it back on tomorrow.

          We all know they didn’t actually have to do this.

        • cyd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          TikTok and its service providers are liable. “No one is enforcing” is meaningless, because they can still be prosecuted retrospectively if the US Government changes its mind.

          • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yup. They even asked for clarification on the “no enforcement” and the Biden administration basically just said “it is what it is”.

            What big company is going to take a risk like that?

            • Ulrich@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              What are they risking, exactly? The entire company has essentially been banned from the country, so they have nothing to lose.

      • Snapz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        As designed by the republicans. There are legitimate reasons to regulate tiktok, if Biden opposed though, they’d say he was a weak Chinese sympathizer, if he complied, they’d do this.

        It was a trap where you were fucked either way, as the republican think tank ghouls drew it out.

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Not sure why you think it’s an own goal. Biden didn’t set the day for it to take effect, that was written into the law by Congress. You could say it was an own goal because Biden announced he wasn’t going to enforce it, but that seems to be the opposite of what you’re trting to claim And even with that decision to not enforce the law for 1 day before the Trump admin takes over, none of the companies TikTok works with like Apple or Google to list it in the app stores gave a shit about that lack of enforcement because of the uncertainty.

        Not to mention Trump being the start of the ban in the first place. He was President when all of this started to work it’s way through the process, even if Biden was the President when it actually made it through Congress, with bipartisan support. Trump only changed positions because he wants TokTok to pay him to continue to allow it to continue.

        • cyd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          More Americans have TikTok accounts than vote. For a shitload of normies who have only the vaguest notion of politics and current affairs, the app they’ve been enjoying gets cut off as the defining event of the waning days of the Biden administration. They are not going to care about how Trump tried to do it first, or it was bipartisan, or whatever. It’s hard not to see how this will cost Dems dearly.

          • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            No it won’t. Biden is already out of office as far as normies are concerned. He has been since the election, but definitely within 24 hours of inauguration. TikTok stops working and the next thing they see is Trump having a huge party with a shit ton of pomp and circumstance for his inauguration as he gets into the White House. And then TikTok still doesn’t work when they open it up. Maybe he brings it back, maybe he doesn’t. Voters don’t pay enough attention to separate his inauguration and the TikTok ban happening 24 hours apart, they’ll bundle it together as one event.

            Unless he gets a massive cash infusion from Bytedance in the next 24 hours, he won’t give TikTok an extension on day one in office. He’s the kind of person that expects his payment up front.

            So everyone will instead see it stop working as President Trump takes over, and then it continuing to not work after. Some may give him the benefit of the doubt, but they weren’t ever going to vote for anyone else anyway, he’s their God Emperor President and they’ve confirmed their world view around him being perfect.

            Heck, he might try to spin it as some sort of promotional opportunity for Truth Social.

            • Serinus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              The law isn’t being enforced. TikTok can just put it back up tomorrow and imply it was Trump that did it.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The entirety of global capitalism is lining up to bend the knee and gargle fascist balls.

      This is what leftists have been warning forever. Capitalism wants the monopolies, bailouts — the political, financial and military backing, etc — that state-capitalist dictatorships provide. Democratically elected governments, acting in the interests of the people, are really the only threat to the corporate oligarchies wealth and power.

      All of the wests “enemies” are equally supportive of fascism, because state-capitalist dictators are easier to influence (bribe).