• Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Last year, the teams responsible for Pixel hardware and Android software were merged into one division, and Google today announced a “voluntary exit program” for employees working in the Platforms & Devices group.

    At least there’s some plausible reasoning for this, instead of blanket headcount reduction to pad profits. Reasoning doesn’t change much of course.

    • icedterminal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      If you have any intent to play with Android OS variants or the stock OS, don’t buy Verizon devices. Ever. They will not give you the decryption key or unlock key.

      Apple, Google, Samsung and Motorola all sell devices on their websites as full price or up to 36 month financing. You can get them carrier unlocked. Motorola and Google offer bootloader unlocking should you want to.

    • Hawk@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Are you able to buy unlocked directly from Google? I typically avoid the carrier when I can.

      • Maiq@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Buy an unlocked one from box box stores. Bought mine from best buy. Immediately threw GrapheneOS on it. Coming from a locked down Samsung s9 that I couldn’t root to an degoogled android experience I didn’t even have to root is fucking awesome!

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Verizon will let you transfer the phone to a different carrier after like 3 months of owning the phone.

      • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Carrier unlock and bootloader unlock are very different things. All my 60x motorola Z phones can use any carrier Well, they could if I hadn’t replaced the antenna with a dummy resistor but that’s beside the point. The point is I cannot have administrative access to my phone and that means I cannot change something I really really need to change on them to make them useful for my purpose.

        Essentially, I cannot “sudo” on these phones and that’s making them very difficult to use.

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          When you change carriers, they unlock it.

          When I moved from Verizon to ATT on my phone, all the Verizon crap disappeared as soon as Verizon released the device. ATT then pushed an OTA that put all their bullshit a day or so later of course, but there was a window they’re when I probably could’ve gotten more access.

  • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Imagine all of this talent going to work for grapheneOS and/or hardware company willing to make a phone with grapheneOS as its OS.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Does grapheneOS have paid devs or is it all volunteer work? And if they do pay devs, how do they get the money to pay them?

        • orange@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Overlap with desktop Linux means support for that is support for these mobile Linux distros, and desktop Linux gets support from a range of people and companies, not just Google.

      • ultimate@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Imagine using Ubuntu Touch with Waydroid for Android Compatibility. Would be sick.

              • ultimate@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Oh nice that it’s still holding up. May I ask if that’s your primary daily driver?

                • FreeBooteR69@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  It does what i need it to do, make/receive calls, surf the web and play videos when i’m out and about. For gaming i prefer Steam deck or PC. Other than that i’m not a lover of smart phones, in general i think they suck. If i could make/receive calls from a steam deck, i would trash my phone in a second.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Same. They just don’t do what I need on my phone. Hopefully that changes, but PinePhone HW kinda sucks (poor battery life and audio quality), and most of the other phones w/ Linux support have some pretty serious caveats.

      • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Same, I’m really tired of the annoying Android logic. I wish we could have a logical OS where we could manage our files properly instead of the filesystem mess we currently have with stuff all over the place.

        It didn’t matter when the phones just had a few megs of storage, but you can carry some serious data on those things nowadays.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          That was one thing that was wild about the Palm WebOS devices. It was just plain old linux. Games? They were just Linux games using SDL. Porting WebOS applications to desktop linux would have been nearly trivial. It would have just been amazing if Palm had pulled it off (alas, they chased a single design, Blackberry-style with small form factor, which missed just so much of the market). The users were utterly oblivious to all this (which is good) and it was just the best combination of capable of great things easily with a power user and able to run whatever the casual user would have needed.

          It was still before Android was pretty much a sealed deal in the market (2009 Android was still horribly rough) so it had a shot, but Palm just couldn’t pull it off.

          • SynAcker@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Oh man… What a great phone. Awesome multi tasking. Wifi charging standard. A back button that actually worked. A slide out keyboard. They just could spool up an app ecosystem quickly enough to gain traction…

            • jj4211@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              The apps may have been a bit anemic, but it was early enough that all the app stores were not great. They were certainly hurt by their initial “JavaScript only” stance.

              Really painful was that they had exclusivity with Sprint of all carriers. That was a really limiting decision.

              I think ultimately the singularly fatal issue was the HP debacle. The initial circumstances of the acquisition might not have been ok for the platform. Thanks to some leaked material HP under Hurd actually seemed to have some vision for reinvigorating their consumer brand including an emphasis on former products. But Hurd was ousted and that whole initiative was canned and the new leadership killed the product line that they had just bought. Which was the most baffling call, they didn’t make room for some other smartphone or tablet platform, they just shrugged and killed off a product that was their only shot at relevance for a clearly exploding new consumer market.

    • TK420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m ready for Linux-phone, but maybe GraphineOS is my gateway. I’m tired of my iPhone not doing the things it should.

    • hayes_@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      You don’t get severance when you quit.

      Severance is usually worse if you wait to get fired rather than taking a voluntary exit.

      If you aren’t happy at a job, taking an offered exit is often a good decision.

    • designated_fridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s probably implied that if not enough people take this offer - people will be fired.

      I’ve been through tech layoffs. Random people are axed and people who thought about leaving anyways stay. This is a much better solution where those who considered leaving anyways can take them up on the offer.

    • Dlayknee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I can’t imagine so, they’re only just now prepping the first pixel phone on their own in-house CPU (pixel 10) and development is underway for the following generation (pixel 11). To axe the line now would be crazy.

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        This is not the way to do that. This is a way to get rid of your best people because, as the United States government is about to find out, when you offer a voluntary exit to people with a severance package the ones who know they have ability and are competent will take that package and leave and get better jobs. And the ones that know they suck or are too lazy are going to stay. There’s actually a list somewhere of companies that have done this and have gone under because of it.

        • Squizzy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Probably the aim of the failed state to be fair. Privatise talent, leave behind people alienate and blame. Shithole country.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      The Pixel 9 Pro is incredible. Writing this on it right now. I love it. Previously had the 6. I’ll be sad if they go away, for real.

  • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is the best way to do headcount reductions imo. In large organisations there’s always someone who’s been there for a long time and gotten tired of the work, and that would gladly take this type of offer if it’s lucrative enough.

    To demonstrate - imagine that you’ve been considering quitting your job for a while. Then someone comes along and says that if you do that, you also get some additional cash for free. You’d probably take it, right?

    And if you necessarily need to reduce headcount, then there’s also the argument that if someone leaves voluntarily, then someone who wants to stay doesn’t have to get pushed out.

    So yeah, I’m not against this

    • Noxy@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Neither pixel nor android teams should need reductions, this is Google being cheap and fucking with employees’ income for no reason other than blind greed.

      • Makhno@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Neither pixel nor android teams should need reductions

        Oh, you work there? Please regale us with your insider knowledge

      • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I mean, you’re probably right, but between this and regular layoffs? This every day of the week

        • Noxy@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Well yeah, being given the option is better than the alternative. I just wish folks wouldn’t accept the premise that Google has any legitimate reason to lay anyone off from Android or Pixel teams. Android, of all things, one of the most widely used operating systems on the planet.

          • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            It’s not to say I accept it, but I also know that I don’t exactly have a choice in the matter.

            This has been the worst part about working in tech since the big layoff period from about the beginning of 2023 - unthinkable levels of uncertainty in your life.

            Still definitely got a better deal than most in life, but damn if it hasn’t been mentally taxing

            • Noxy@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              I feel it. My company thankfully hasn’t done any layoffs, but I still don’t feel very secure, and I no longer feel like I’ll be able to easily find another job that pays enough if something does happen.

              And that’s without all the rest of the uncertainty going on right now…

    • idefix@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      In my experience with this format, only the good ones are leaving and you’re stuck with the rest.

      • Ibuthyr@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Absolutely. The ones who’ve resigned mentally are fine within their positions. The people with all the business connections and references will be the ones to grab the money and simply start something new. It happened at my company. I was only 3 years in, so it wasn’t enough money for me to quit. But loads of good people left the company.

      • Buckshot@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        My last job did this. They offered more for those who had worked there longer. People with over 15 years got about a years pay and they all took it. People who had been there under a year got nothing so they all stayed.

        I was going to take then they withdrew the offer for all devs. I think a lot tried to take it and they realised no one would be left. I would have got 3-4 months pay. Loads of institutional knowledge lost though, i left anyway a few months later.

      • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Depends on if the good people have better places to go, I guess. My guess is that you’re probably going to lose people who have some amount of tenure, especially if you’re the kind of company that gives equity that vests on a 4-year schedule. Even if you’re not, people with some amount of tenure will be the ones trending towards being checked out already.

        Losing people with tenure means you lose organisational memory, which can definitely be negative.

        This is all to say that as an organisation, you should think twice about doing any kind of layoff. They are all bad in their own way. This just happens to be the format that is least bad for most workers, which is why I prefer it.